عنوان المقال عربي
مساواة وتباين الأيديولوجيات في كتاب "الاسمية والواقعية" لـ ر. و. إيمرسون: دراسة أسلوبية نقدية
Abstract
Equating and contrasting are found to be helpful textual tools through which a text producer can construct a variety of visions of the world. Such world views can be reflected via language mediation processes that convey writer’s individual experiences in an attempt to structure their ideologies either through equating or contradicting other ideas in their textual practices. Thus, the current article is a practice of such issues applied to Emerson’s essay entitled “Nominalist and Realist” to realize his logic concerning the different approaches to abstract ideas, empiricism, and the universal triggers of knowledge between the two poles of thinking, namely: the nominalist and the realist. In terms of the two selected textual elements “equating and contrasting”, the individualism and universalism are thoroughly scrutinized in this study to stand on those language features that contribute to the growing realization of the affirmation and/or denial of the various propositions in the essay under analysis.
Keywords
Contrasting, balance, contrast, language tools, nominal, real, individual, universal.
Recommended Citation
Jabbar, Zeina H. and Sharhan, Alaa Hussein
(2025)
"Equating and Contrasting Ideologies in R. W. Emerson’s “Nominalist and Realist”: A critical Stylistic Study,"
Uruk for Humanities: Vol. 16:
Iss.
4, Article 26.
Available at:
https://muthuruk.mu.edu.iq/journal/vol16/iss4/26
