عنوان المقال عربي
العنف والتطرف الفكري وأثرهما على التعايش السلمي وبناء الدولة في العراق بعد عام 2003
Abstract
Indeed, ideological extremism and violence lead to a political and economic conflict between the parties responsible for the governance of Iraq. This is the weakest framework for building the state, especially after the historical opportunity that came to the political decision-maker, especially after the end of the totalitarian regime (dictatorship) era in 2003. The fragility of the Iraqi state played a major role in turning to the extremism of the political decision-maker according to sectarian (ideological) affiliation, not the homeland, and moving away from loyalty to the homeland and moving towards sectarian components that believe in violence and ideology extremism, which greatly affected peaceful coexistence. Violence and extremism became the ones controlling the building of the state along with the ruling parties that believe in revenge and regional loyalties. The article attempts to find solutions that believe in building a modern state that includes ensuring peaceful coexistence away from violence and intellectual extremism, in addition to believing in citizenship and belonging. The research also dealt with the problem of state building after 2003, in addition to the most important foundations and rules that ensure the success of building the Iraqi state, and perhaps the most prominent of these foundations are political reform and the end of political and partisan bias resulting from the extremism of the ideas of the leaders of the blocs forming the government.
Keywords
Ideological extremism in Iraq, violence in Iraq, ideological extremism in Iraq, state building, peaceful coexistence.
Recommended Citation
Abdullah, Abbas Jaber
(2025)
"Violence and intellectual extremism and their impact on peaceful coexistence and state-building in Iraq after 2003,"
Uruk for Humanities: Vol. 15:
Iss.
3, Article 81.
Available at:
https://muthuruk.mu.edu.iq/journal/vol15/iss3/81
