عنوان المقال عربي
الطلاق السُّكْر " طلاق السكران " : دراسة فقهية مقارنة.
Abstract
This is a brief study that includes a comparative jurisprudence study on eight Doctrines of thought - the four Doctrines of thought, in addition to the doctrine of al'iimamia, Zaidi, alzaahiria and Ibadi - in the ruling on drunken divorce, The reason for choosing the subject is the increase in divorce cases in society, due to the problem of alcohol abuse, In the research, a definition of the jurisprudential rulings of divorce in the event of intoxication, The research includes the definition of divorce in language and idiom, and the issue of differences of opinion among jurists regarding the issue of drunken divorce, which I paved the way for the definition of drunkenness, The drunk on which the Sharia rulings are based limited the permissibility of selling, buying and divorce Then I presented the doctrines of the jurists regarding the ruling on a drunken divorce: does it count or not? After that, I collected the evidence of each team from what is transmitted and reasonable and the responses of some of them to some of their answers, and I extracted the hadiths and the effects that each team had inferred in the margin, and I showed the preponderant opinion after studying the evidence of each team, and I made the research conclude with the most important conclusions I reached.
Keywords
Divorce . Comparative. jurisprudence
Recommended Citation
Meraid, Hiad Ismail
(2025)
"Drunk divorce " talaq alsukaran" : A Comparative Jurisprudence Study.,"
Uruk for Humanities: Vol. 14:
Iss.
4, Article 18.
Available at:
https://muthuruk.mu.edu.iq/journal/vol14/iss4/18
